There are lots of reasons parents should probably
"And even if an accurate device was available, the large majority of babies don’t need monitoring at home. "The accuracy and performance of the Owlet Smart Sock is something that we take very seriously.One strength of the new China Back-lit blade signs wholesale study is that it "included a mixture of patients that were sick enough to be in the hospital," said Dr. "Owlet is designed for in-home use, with healthy babies while they sleep, to provide parents with information about their child’s well-being," he said.Bonafide worries that the devices might give parents a false sense of security when babies are truly sick.
For example, he said, "take the parent who is watching a baby closely because the child has caught a cold or maybe is developing pneumonia. "There is no evidence that these monitors prevent SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome). It did, however, often falsely display low pulse rates. make me concerned that they could not just be unhelpful but that they could also create problems.Kurt Workman, co-founder and CEO of Owlet, noted in a statement emailed to Reuters Health that the most accurate method of assessing oxygen saturation involves testing blood that’s been drawn from an artery. The Baby Vida missed 102 occasions in which the baby’s oxygen saturation was too low, but it never sounded an alarm when nothing was wrong.Of the two monitors, the Owlet Smart Sock 2 performed better. Chris Bonafide of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Gary Satou, director of pediatric echocardiography and co-director of fetal cardiology at the UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital in Los Angeles.Monitors in hospitals "have to meet stringent demands and are serviced every year," said Diacovo, who was not involved in the new study. So instead of bringing the baby in that night, the parent might decide to wait till morning.Two popular monitors that promise to keep parents informed about their babies’ vital signs scored poorly in a test comparing them with actual hospital quality monitors, researchers say. .". Thomas Diacovo, chief of newborn medicine at Magee-Womens Hospital and the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
The commercially available monitors, which are not approved by the U. Food and Drug Administration, promise to sound an alarm via parents’ cell phones if the baby’s heart rate or blood oxygen levels move into danger zones, according to the study in JAMA."Owlet sensor accuracy has been validated in studies performed by independent laboratories and when compared to arterial blood gas measurements the sensor performed well within international standards for pulse oximetry," he added.S. To get a sense of how well the current generation of vital-signs monitors worked, he and his colleagues hooked 30 infants up to a hospital monitor on one foot and one of the consumer monitors on the other.
"Bonafide started wondering about commercially available monitors after treating a child brought to the emergency room because of a false alarm. The parent might be concerned about how fast the baby is breathing but because the monitor falsely displays that the baby is OK when oxygen levels are dangerously low, that might reassure a parent who would otherwise have brought the child to the hospital for care. But it excluded infants who were very sick, Satou said.The Owlet device missed 9 occasions in which the baby’s oxygen saturation was alarmingly low, accurately caught low oxygen saturation 71 times and falsely sounded the alarm 26 times."There are lots of reasons parents should probably not be using consumer vital sign monitors," said study leader Dr.The study shows that these consumer monitors "are not ready for prime time," said Satou, who is not affiliated with the new research. The other monitor, the Baby Vida, performed even worse, completely missing unhealthy vital signs. And the issues with accuracy . But it still often sounded the alarm when there was nothing wrong and sometimes missed instances when blood oxygen levels were too low."There is also concern that false alarms will send parents rushing to the emergency room, said Dr."The manufacturer of the Baby Vida did not respond to a request for comment
برچسب: ،